Skip to main content

Guest Blog Post: A Position to Change

Here is an interesting perspective from a guest blogger. I agree that we need to all take small steps, and stand together, if we are to have strong qualified candidates come 2006 and 2008:
From Adam Graham at Adam's Blog

I might be able to capture Osama Bin-Laden, if I were in the mountains of Pakistan. However, being in the Treasure Valley in Idaho would make the task impossible.

This is where we find ourselves with Presidential campaigns. Come election years, Conservatives clamor for their candidates, but are in no position to get them into office.

What we have is a lot of screaming from back benches from true Conservatives about the establishment controlling the money, rigging the process, and making it impossible for anyone but the establishment choice to win.

This is called whining. Poor preparation leads to poor results. You're going to get back what you put in and if you want to effect what happens in 2008, you need to be in position to influence the race. There are two major things you can do:

First, run for a Precinct Captain position: This will allow you to choose your county party leaders and to be also make contacts with other Conservatives in your area and build a network which can effectively organize Conservatives across your local area.

It is easier than you would think to get into these organizations. The most common elected Precinct Captain is "Vacant" in many areas. If you can get into one of them, you're in a position to promote presidential candidates and Conservative values within the GOP. If you're mad at "RINOs" in your local party leadership, get over it. They're there because there's not been an organized attempt to change the face of the
party and that must be your priority. If efforts are made to change the Republican Party at the bottom, reform will reach the top. Be sure to read up on your local laws before trying to run for the Precinct Captain.

Secondly, money is the mother's milk of politics and the reason so many Conservative candidates lose or won't run in the first place is the inability of their supporters to raise cash for a successful campaign. No one wants to spend months upon months away from their families, pointlessly traveling from one city to another with little rest. If we're going to ask someone to make that sacrifice, we have to provide them the money to run a successful campaign.

The Party establishment gets their money $2,000 at a time, which isn't going to work for true conservatives, but a small amount of people together can make a huge difference. If you want change in Washington, put your money where your mouth is. Take $10 a month, put I it into a savings account or in a shoe box, or the next two years and you would have $240 to contribute to the Presidential campaign of your choice. If 250,000 people (.1% of the American population) would do this from January, 2006 on, a true Conservative candidate could raise $60 million for building organization, buying media, and running a professional campaign.

If you want more of the same, then do what you've done before and you'll get the government you deserve. If you want to see a government that from the top down is fiscally responsible, socially conservative, and safeguards our borders, then its time to put your shoulder to the wheel. Nearly two hundred and thirty years ago, our Founding Fathers pledged their "lives, fortunes, and sacred honor" to build this country. Can we not spare a few Big Macs and a few hours a year to save it?


Popular posts from this blog

Hispanic Trending: Leave your name at the border

Most people miss the fact that Hispanics do not consist of a single ethnic group. Besides that, the heritage that each one of the many nationalities represented in our immigrant population is diverse in itself. As I read Manuel Muñoz's post on his assimilation experience, I can tell you mine was nothing like his. But I can relate to this paragraph. My niece's name is Katie Belle (Sierra). It's intriguing to watch "American" names begin to dominate among my nieces and nephews and second cousins, as well as with the children of my hometown friends. I am not surprised to meet 5-year-old Brandon or Kaitlyn. Hardly anyone questions the incongruity of matching these names with last names like Trujillo or Zepeda. The English-only way of life partly explains the quiet erasure of cultural difference that assimilation has attempted to accomplish. A name like Kaitlyn Zepeda doesn't completely obscure her ethnicity, but the half-step of her nam…

RealClearPolitics: The Democrats Dither on Trade

The backtracking on free trade in South America has been among the frustrating news for me coming out of the beltway. Considering how the economic downturns in Latin America affect us through the increase in illegal immigration, I would think more Americans would be fighting for this one as loudly as they fought for the failed Immigration legislation. Democratic presidential candidates like to talk about "turning a page" in America's relations with the rest of the world. But what does that mean, in practical terms, on bread-and-butter issues such as trade? Are today's Democrats a party of open markets and economic development, or of market restrictions and job protection?The answer is that leading Democrats seem to want both -- they favor economic development overseas but not at the cost of U.S. jobs. That sounds like a coherent position until you begin to look carefully at the political choices in Latin America, a part of the world where …

The Importance of English for Immigrants

With all the attention to the border security problem, and the challenges the nation is facing in regards to immigration, here are some thoughts on why learning English is of such importance to immigrants. More importantly, America would benefit greatly if we put a higher priority on getting immigrants to learn English. We are talking about improvements for the economy, reductions in crime, and much more.

Learning English allows an immigrant to:
1. Spread their wings beyond the urban Spanish-speaking enclaves. This, of course, leads to better integration, and a better understanding of what our country really looks like--nothing like "el barrio" in LA. But it also has implications as far as housing, jobs, and more. If an immigrant feels compelled to only live in certain areas to be close to other immigrants, this will place serious limitations on housing and jobs available. God knows housing prices are bad enough in LA and in Miami.

2. Improve on the job opportunities available.…