Skip to main content

Dobson: Write Wolf Blitzer, CNN and remind him "I am not a reverend"

This is so funny! I mean, the media is so hell-bent on distorting the news according to their own way of seeing the world, they can't even get a basic fact straight. What part about the most notable child psychologist in the nation NOT being a reverend do they not understand? Can a regular citizen speak out on moral and faith issues? Or, is that something only for reverends and priests?

I do hope the CNN mailroom and phone banks just get flooded. I, of course, never watch CNN. While you are emailing Blitzer, let him know about a great course being offered down at my community college--JOU 101. I think one of the first lessons has to do with getting your facts straight.

Well, here is the invitiation from the CitizenLink email editors calling on readers (and Dr. Dobson's radio show listeners) to contact CNN and help set the record straight.
Dr. Dobson Wants You to Set CNN Straight Network keeps calling him "Reverend"

Focus on the Family Chairman Dr. James Dobson asked listeners to his daily radio show today to set CNN -- and particularly Wolf Blitzer -- straight on what to call him.

In a rather slanted report about a thank-you note Dr. Dobson received from new Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito on Wednesday's edition of Blitzer's "Situation Room" program, a reporter referred to Focus' founder as "Reverend Dobson" five times in only a few seconds of airtime.

It's not an uncommon mistake for the media to make, but Dr. Dobson -- who, for the record, is a licensed psychologist with a Ph.D. in child development -- says CNN shouldn't still be making it.

"Would somebody out there please write Wolf Blitzer at CNN and remind him of what we have told him about 50 times? That I am not a reverend and he ought to know that by now?" Dr. Dobson asked on today's broadcast. "If I were a minister, I'd be honored to say so, but I'm not."

He even suggested a creative way to refer to Blitzer when writing a letter: "You might address your correspondence to Archbishop Blitzer."

We've made it easy for you to do as Dr. Dobson asks. Just visit the link below -- and click the "Go" button at the top when you get there -- to compose an e-mail that will be delivered directly to Blitzer's workstation at CNN.

http://www3.capwiz.com/fof/issues/alert/?alertid=8541436&type=CU
Go ahead: Email him. Oh, ya. Via CitizenLink, here is the "controversial" thank you note from our new supreme court justice.

"Dear Dr. Dobson — This is just a short note to express my heartfelt thanks to you and the entire staff at Focus on the Family for your help and support during the past few, challenging months. I would also greatly appreciate it if you would convey my appreciation to the good people from all parts of the country who wrote to tell me that they were praying for my and for my family during this period."

Repeating what he said at last month's White House investiture ceremony, Alito wrote "the prayers of so many people from around the country were a palpable and powerful force."

He added: "As long as I serve on the Supreme Court, I will keep in mind the trust that has been placed in me."
Sounds very nice to me. Anyone see something wrong with it?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Communism: Good Money for the "El Viejo"

I guess Fidel Castro is doing ok. Forbes lists Castro as one of the richest in the world, right up there with the Queen of England. I bet he didn't like the attention. It was hard to figure it out, but it seems they managed to throw some numbers together.
In the past, we have relied on a percentage of Cuba's gross domestic product to estimate Fidel Castro's fortune. This year we have used more traditional valuation methods, comparing state-owned assets Castro is assumed to control with comparable publicly traded companies. A reasonable discount was then applied to compensate for the obvious disclosure issues.

Hispanic Trending: Leave your name at the border

Most people miss the fact that Hispanics do not consist of a single ethnic group. Besides that, the heritage that each one of the many nationalities represented in our immigrant population is diverse in itself. As I read Manuel Muñoz's post on his assimilation experience, I can tell you mine was nothing like his. But I can relate to this paragraph. My niece's name is Katie Belle (Sierra). It's intriguing to watch "American" names begin to dominate among my nieces and nephews and second cousins, as well as with the children of my hometown friends. I am not surprised to meet 5-year-old Brandon or Kaitlyn. Hardly anyone questions the incongruity of matching these names with last names like Trujillo or Zepeda. The English-only way of life partly explains the quiet erasure of cultural difference that assimilation has attempted to accomplish. A name like Kaitlyn Zepeda doesn't completely obscure her ethnicity, but the half-step of her nam…

RealClearPolitics: The Democrats Dither on Trade

The backtracking on free trade in South America has been among the frustrating news for me coming out of the beltway. Considering how the economic downturns in Latin America affect us through the increase in illegal immigration, I would think more Americans would be fighting for this one as loudly as they fought for the failed Immigration legislation. Democratic presidential candidates like to talk about "turning a page" in America's relations with the rest of the world. But what does that mean, in practical terms, on bread-and-butter issues such as trade? Are today's Democrats a party of open markets and economic development, or of market restrictions and job protection?The answer is that leading Democrats seem to want both -- they favor economic development overseas but not at the cost of U.S. jobs. That sounds like a coherent position until you begin to look carefully at the political choices in Latin America, a part of the world where …