Skip to main content

Latino or Hispanic: What's in a name?

Interesting article. Informative, but not conclusive in any major way. I found it interesting mostly because I have never had an issue with people calling me Latino or Hispanic. Truth is, I think I find it to be a label with which people can grapple with my heritage. I am a US Citizen, and consider myself an American, but the fact remains that I speak Spanish fluently, and my parent's come from Cuba. We live in a culture where this needs to be "tagged" and identified in some sort of way, so if the government wants to call me something, I don't care. As long as it does not infringe or minimize my rights and responsabilities as a citizen, I'm fine. Something to think about.

Here is a little side bar from the National Association of Hispanic Journalists:
LATINO

An umbrella ethnic term describing people in the United States who are either themselves from a Spanish-speaking country or whose ancestors were from a Spanish-speaking country. The U.S. Census Bureau in the 2000 Census applied the terms Latino and Hispanic interchangeably, although Hispanic is a controversial term among some Latinos who view it as a government-imposed label. The term Latino is an ethnic label, not a race of people.

Latino tends to be used more frequently on the West Coast, while Hispanic is more common in the Northeast and Southwest.

HISPANIC

The catch-all ethnic label describing people in the United States who are either themselves from a Spanish-speaking country or whose ancestors were from a Spanish-speaking country. The term Hispanic is controversial among some Latinos who view it as a government-imposed label. The U.S. government created the term and first used it in the 1980 Census to ensure a more accurate count of people in the United States who are of Latin American or Spanish heritage. Because the term strictly applies to those who trace their ancestry to a Spanish-speaking country, the U.S. government does not view individuals from Brazil and Caribbean nations as Hispanics, even though some point out that Brazil and Caribbean nations are geographically located in Latin America. Although Spain is not in Latin America, individuals from Spain are Hispanics, according to the U.S. government. Also, the term Hispanic is an ethnic label, not a race of people.

Source: National Association of Hispanic Journalists
I think this is fine for the purpose of census and administrative issues, but I don't feel it speaks to the issue of identity. I would hope this would be true for other US citizens of Latin American descent.
Lisa Navarrete of the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic activist group based in Washington, D.C., said a 2004 poll by the group found the majority of people did not prefer one label over the other.

The labels attempt to unify "a group of people who are not homogeneous, but are connected in very profound ways," she said. "Whether you use Latino or Hispanic, for our purposes, we're referring to exactly the same group of people."

However, regional preferences exist, she said.

"There's places where Latino is the term preferred and you're not well regarded if you don't use that term," she said. "If you're in California, you need to use Latino. If you're in Texas, you use Hispanic."

Fifteen years ago, most people preferred to be identified by their country of origin, but that has changed somewhat as Latino and Hispanic become more widely used, she said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Al Cardenas Comments on Univision Democrat Forum

Al Cardenas is Chairman of Romney for President's Hispanic Steering Committee. I got the following email from the campaign. Boston, MA – Al Cardenas, the Chairman of Romney for President's National Hispanic Steering Committee, issued the following statement regarding tonight's Democrat presidential forum on Univision: "Tonight's Univision forum demonstrated once again the consequences that a President Clinton, President Obama or President Edwards would have on the Hispanic community.  Whether it's tax increases for families and the two million Hispanic business owners, socialist-style health care, coddling dictators, opposing free trade with our allies or putting family values last, the Democrat presidential candidates made clear how out of sync their policies are with the best interests of the Hispanic community. Mitt Romney has put in the effort to reach out to this vital bloc, and, after watching tonight's debate

Harry Potter Mania -- Discussion

There is a great discussion going on at WorldMagBlog on the whole Harry Potter mania. Nothing to do with Latinos, I suppose, but I thought I would ad my two cents. A reader commented: I think its interesting how much people want to be in a group that is all connected by some common thread. It says a lot about our desire for homogeny, not always along racial, sexual or religious lines, but also simply based on what we do in our spare time. The interesting thing about Harry Potter fans vs. Star Trek fans is that a vast majority of them are kids who have grown up with the books, or the parents of said kids. I wonder if what sort of effects this will have on them as they get older (and whether or not they will remain HP fans). We live in an obsessive culture. Posted by David B. at July 22, 2005 07:54 AM This is an interesting phenomenon. I would think it is indicative of our society, more than anything else. I tend to agree with the idea that it shows a desire or need for communi

Communism: Good Money for the "El Viejo"

I guess Fidel Castro is doing ok . Forbes lists Castro as one of the richest in the world, right up there with the Queen of England. I bet he didn't like the attention. It was hard to figure it out, but it seems they managed to throw some numbers together. In the past, we have relied on a percentage of Cuba's gross domestic product to estimate Fidel Castro's fortune. This year we have used more traditional valuation methods, comparing state-owned assets Castro is assumed to control with comparable publicly traded companies. A reasonable discount was then applied to compensate for the obvious disclosure issues.