Skip to main content

Stemming the Problem of Illegal Immigration

Jake Jacobsen from from Freedom Folks commented on yesterday's immigration post.
I just feel it's time for Mexico to get it's shit together and start taking care of it's people. That is not the United States problem nor responsibility.

And unfortunately, we provide a relief valve for the corrupt Mexican Gov. by eliminating the need for them to change. So long as people can come here illegally, and so long as remittances comprise such an astronomical portion of the Mexican economy, I guarantee they won't change.
The thing is, we live in a growingly global economy, and this has real implications for society and culture. So, in fact, it is our problem too! But, you are right--it should NOT be our responsibility. That's why I have been in favor of CAFTA and NAFTA, because it empowers Latin American countries to take steps forward economically.

Jacobsen is affirming the exact point I was attempting to make--that "we provide a relief valve for the corrupt Mexican Gov. by eliminating the need for them to change." To ad injury to insult, police officers and other branches of the government are having their hands tied, and are many times not allowed to even ask an individuals immigration status! That is probably going to start changing, as voters put pressure on their local governments do reform in this area.

I had not thought about the question about allegiance. For citizens, I agree without a doubt. A new citizen should immediately renounce all past allegiances, and should not be allowed to participate in foreign political processes. Of course, and illegal immigrant should not be in this country in the first place, so there is no question about allegiance--they should not have any conveniences or the normal voting and civic rights a law-abiding individual enjoys.

An immigrant resident, while not a US citizen, may be on track for citizenship. So, perhaps that should be part of the application process--if you are planning to apply for citizenship, then you should not be allowed to participate in a foreign countries political processes. I do not see a problem with a worker on a legal temporary work permit being allowed to continue being a good citizen of his or her home country.

In short, illegals have to much influence, and its given to them by the left who want to hinder enforcement. Illegals are also moving a lot of money, so you know that is a big influencer domestically and in these foreign countries. Perhaps money transfers should be restricted to legal immigrants, individuals on legal work permits, legal tourists, residents and citizens. This would dry up the flow of money. To be clear, I am not against an individual sending money to his or her family in a home country--as long as they are the country legally. We live in a global economy, so any dollars produced through honest hard work will return a dividend for the American economy either way. There is not question about the economics of this--it is more an issue of immigrants living under the law.

Michelle Mallkin has more on the issue of enforcement.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Communism: Good Money for the "El Viejo"

I guess Fidel Castro is doing ok. Forbes lists Castro as one of the richest in the world, right up there with the Queen of England. I bet he didn't like the attention. It was hard to figure it out, but it seems they managed to throw some numbers together.
In the past, we have relied on a percentage of Cuba's gross domestic product to estimate Fidel Castro's fortune. This year we have used more traditional valuation methods, comparing state-owned assets Castro is assumed to control with comparable publicly traded companies. A reasonable discount was then applied to compensate for the obvious disclosure issues.

Hispanic Trending: Leave your name at the border

Most people miss the fact that Hispanics do not consist of a single ethnic group. Besides that, the heritage that each one of the many nationalities represented in our immigrant population is diverse in itself. As I read Manuel Muñoz's post on his assimilation experience, I can tell you mine was nothing like his. But I can relate to this paragraph. My niece's name is Katie Belle (Sierra). It's intriguing to watch "American" names begin to dominate among my nieces and nephews and second cousins, as well as with the children of my hometown friends. I am not surprised to meet 5-year-old Brandon or Kaitlyn. Hardly anyone questions the incongruity of matching these names with last names like Trujillo or Zepeda. The English-only way of life partly explains the quiet erasure of cultural difference that assimilation has attempted to accomplish. A name like Kaitlyn Zepeda doesn't completely obscure her ethnicity, but the half-step of her nam…

Podcast: Talking GOP Debate and No Child Left Behind

Click here to listen to the MP3 audio of the discussion between Michel Martin, Stephen Henderson and myself on the GOP debate, and Bush's push for No Child Left Behind. The segment on the new gospel music competition reality show is a great segment -- check it out as well. Tell Me More, October 12, 2007 · This week, GOP presidential contenders met for a debate in Dearborn, Michigan. Meanwhile, President Bush was stumping for reauthorization of the education bill, "No Child Left Behind." In this week's Political Chat, hear insights from political blogger Josue Sierra and Stephen Henderson, Deputy Editorial Page Editor at the Detroit Free Press.

You can listen on the NPR website right here.


Related Posts:
- On Air: Talking GOP Debate and No Child Left Behind
- GOP Economy Debate


Other Posts of Interest:
- Conference for Minority Journalists of Faith Cross posted at:
http://josue.townhall.com/g/539550d0-6e62-45a9-b375-f9d534488f25