Skip to main content

Take me to your leader!

Is this your political leadership? Democrats should take note.
In the early 1940s, a politically ambitious butcher from West Virginia
named Bob Byrd recruited 150 of his friends and associates to form a chapter of
the Ku Klux Klan. After Byrd had collected the $10 joining fee and $3 charge for
a robe and hood from every applicant, the "Grand Dragon" for the mid-Atlantic
states came down to tiny Crab Orchard, W.Va., to officially organize the
chapter.

As Byrd recalls now, the Klan official, Joel L. Baskin of Arlington,
Va., was so impressed with the young Byrd's organizational skills that he urged
him to go into politics. "The country needs young men like you in the leadership
of the nation," Baskin said.

The young Klan leader went on to become one of the most powerful and
enduring figures in modern Senate history. Throughout a half-century on Capitol
Hill, Sen. Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.) has twice held the premier leadership post
in the Senate, helped win ratification of the Panama Canal treaty, squeezed
billions from federal coffers to aid his home state, and won praise from
liberals for his opposition to the war in Iraq and his defense of minority party
rights in the Senate.

Despite his many achievements, however, the venerated Byrd has never
been able to fully erase the stain of his association with one of the most
reviled hate groups in the nation's history.

It is unconscionable that a minority would stand in association with this sort of man. In "Robert C. Byrd: Child of the Appalachian Coalfields", Byrd writes of his past, but,

...The account is not complete. He does not acknowledge the full length of time
he spent as a Klan organizer and advocate. Nor does he make any mention of a
particularly incendiary letter he wrote in 1945 complaining about efforts to
integrate the military.
If only more voters would pay attention at the choices the political leadership makes. It is time that our politicians are held accountable, if they intend to be public figures making decisions that will affect our lives, and that of our men and women in the military.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Al Cardenas Comments on Univision Democrat Forum

Al Cardenas is Chairman of Romney for President's Hispanic Steering Committee. I got the following email from the campaign. Boston, MA – Al Cardenas, the Chairman of Romney for President's National Hispanic Steering Committee, issued the following statement regarding tonight's Democrat presidential forum on Univision: "Tonight's Univision forum demonstrated once again the consequences that a President Clinton, President Obama or President Edwards would have on the Hispanic community.  Whether it's tax increases for families and the two million Hispanic business owners, socialist-style health care, coddling dictators, opposing free trade with our allies or putting family values last, the Democrat presidential candidates made clear how out of sync their policies are with the best interests of the Hispanic community. Mitt Romney has put in the effort to reach out to this vital bloc, and, after watching tonight's debate

Harry Potter Mania -- Discussion

There is a great discussion going on at WorldMagBlog on the whole Harry Potter mania. Nothing to do with Latinos, I suppose, but I thought I would ad my two cents. A reader commented: I think its interesting how much people want to be in a group that is all connected by some common thread. It says a lot about our desire for homogeny, not always along racial, sexual or religious lines, but also simply based on what we do in our spare time. The interesting thing about Harry Potter fans vs. Star Trek fans is that a vast majority of them are kids who have grown up with the books, or the parents of said kids. I wonder if what sort of effects this will have on them as they get older (and whether or not they will remain HP fans). We live in an obsessive culture. Posted by David B. at July 22, 2005 07:54 AM This is an interesting phenomenon. I would think it is indicative of our society, more than anything else. I tend to agree with the idea that it shows a desire or need for communi

Communism: Good Money for the "El Viejo"

I guess Fidel Castro is doing ok . Forbes lists Castro as one of the richest in the world, right up there with the Queen of England. I bet he didn't like the attention. It was hard to figure it out, but it seems they managed to throw some numbers together. In the past, we have relied on a percentage of Cuba's gross domestic product to estimate Fidel Castro's fortune. This year we have used more traditional valuation methods, comparing state-owned assets Castro is assumed to control with comparable publicly traded companies. A reasonable discount was then applied to compensate for the obvious disclosure issues.