Skip to main content

Abdul Rahman Rally--Standing for Religious Freedom In Afghanistan

Update 2: (Newer updates on top) CitizenLink writes that "Western and Middle Eastern news agencies reported today that an Afghani Christian on trial for converting from Islam will apparently be released in the coming days." They had a feature story in today's email. Also, Michelle Malkin has more on this development.

I liked the quote on CitizenLink by U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C.
"It is clear that the Muslims are settling in all countries, including the United States, and they are expecting religious freedom where they are," he said. "But in many places where Muslims are in charge--especially in charge of the government--they are not granting those same freedoms.
He is right. This is not just about Abdul Rahman. This is about human rights for the Muslim world--rights they sure enjoy here in the United States.

Cam Edwards had some great observations regarding the Afgani constitution.

In looking over Afghanistan's constitution, I noticed a few things.

1- No right to keep and bear arms (yes, I look for these things)

2- Article 7 states "“The state shall abide by the UN charter, international treaties, international conventions that Afghanistan has signed, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights."

3- Article 58 establishes an Independent Human Rights Commission.

Now, if you'’re abiding by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, then Abdul Rahman should be freed immediately, because that document states "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance."” (Article 18)

Update: Welcome to Hugh Hewitt (Thanks MK!) and La Shawn Barber readers.

Cam Edwards has more pictures, as well as Jeff Harrell and Tom Bridge. I got to meet Michelle Malkin for the first time, and chatted for a bit with Charmaine Yoest (who I met at the State of the Union Part at FRC some months ago). I'm liking living in D.C. simply because I enjoy seeing and experiencing the events--and writing about it from a first person account-- instead of just reading about it in the papers. I find it fun to be part of an Army of Davids.


I just got back in from the Abdul Rahman event at the Afghanistan embassy. There was a nice group of people there. I counted about 50.

Reuters was there fishing for anti-Bush sentiments. It was patheticly obvious. How do these reporters do it?

So, the reporter kept asking question after question, trying to tilt the story to paint it as a defection on the right against Bush. We'll see what clips they use--I'm sure you will get something taken completely out of context.

I had my digital camera with me and got his picture here on the left. Someone said that NBC was there, as well as a couple other networks. I saw at least 4 cameras, though I was only able to identify Reuters.

Mary Katharine will be posting some quotes and has more of my pictures. Check it out.

There was someone with a awesome sign that said, "Even the ACLU doesn't hate Christians this much." I don't know who he was, but his web site is, which I recognize as that blog that got blocked by Google China web site.

Tags: , Iraq, Bush, Politics, War, Afghanistan, News, Politik


Popular posts from this blog

Communism: Good Money for the "El Viejo"

I guess Fidel Castro is doing ok. Forbes lists Castro as one of the richest in the world, right up there with the Queen of England. I bet he didn't like the attention. It was hard to figure it out, but it seems they managed to throw some numbers together.
In the past, we have relied on a percentage of Cuba's gross domestic product to estimate Fidel Castro's fortune. This year we have used more traditional valuation methods, comparing state-owned assets Castro is assumed to control with comparable publicly traded companies. A reasonable discount was then applied to compensate for the obvious disclosure issues.

Hispanic Trending: Leave your name at the border

Most people miss the fact that Hispanics do not consist of a single ethnic group. Besides that, the heritage that each one of the many nationalities represented in our immigrant population is diverse in itself. As I read Manuel Muñoz's post on his assimilation experience, I can tell you mine was nothing like his. But I can relate to this paragraph. My niece's name is Katie Belle (Sierra). It's intriguing to watch "American" names begin to dominate among my nieces and nephews and second cousins, as well as with the children of my hometown friends. I am not surprised to meet 5-year-old Brandon or Kaitlyn. Hardly anyone questions the incongruity of matching these names with last names like Trujillo or Zepeda. The English-only way of life partly explains the quiet erasure of cultural difference that assimilation has attempted to accomplish. A name like Kaitlyn Zepeda doesn't completely obscure her ethnicity, but the half-step of her nam…

RealClearPolitics: The Democrats Dither on Trade

The backtracking on free trade in South America has been among the frustrating news for me coming out of the beltway. Considering how the economic downturns in Latin America affect us through the increase in illegal immigration, I would think more Americans would be fighting for this one as loudly as they fought for the failed Immigration legislation. Democratic presidential candidates like to talk about "turning a page" in America's relations with the rest of the world. But what does that mean, in practical terms, on bread-and-butter issues such as trade? Are today's Democrats a party of open markets and economic development, or of market restrictions and job protection?The answer is that leading Democrats seem to want both -- they favor economic development overseas but not at the cost of U.S. jobs. That sounds like a coherent position until you begin to look carefully at the political choices in Latin America, a part of the world where …