Skip to main content

Jim Gilchrist and Immigration: A Conversation with Tom Hoefling

I recently read about Jim Gilchrist's campaign for congress. I checked out his web site, and read all about his position on immigration and pork spending. Frankly, I liked what it said, but I was concerned about the possibility of racism being part of the mix. So, I wrote an email to the address indicated in his web site, and got a response from Republican activist, strategist and consultant, Tom Hoefling. I must say: I am no longer concerned as far as racism and Gilchrist is concerned.

I have said this before about other ethnic groups, and I will say it now about latinos: Latinos need to stand up and speak up in regards to the problem of immigration. Silence and fear of public opinion will only make us weaker. Worst, the greater the problem of illegal immigration, the more racism we will see. Not because of the leaders like Tancredo or Gilchrist, but because of liberals and because of extremist and racists that will take the frustration, and use it as a catalyst to foster more racism. I'm glad that Gilchrist is running, and that he is speaking out. But, more of us need to speak out against illegal immigration.

More Latinos need to face the truth, and be a voice against the lawlessness that is endangering our privileges and our welcome in this nation.

Following is the exchange.
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 7:41 PM
Subject: Question for Mr. Gilchrist about immigration

Dear Mr. Gilchrist;

My name is Josue Sierra, I am a US born citizen of Cuban heritage. My mother immigrated to the United States legally, as a resident, and my father escaped Cuba hidden in a ship, as my grandfather--a college professor and pastor--feared repressions from Castro.

I just discovered your web site today, and your campaign for Congress. Reading your position plan on controlling illegal immigration, and your position on pork spending, I can't help by pray you do win. I write today, because as someone of Hispanic descent, I am concerned that anti-immigrant sentiments are growing in this country.

I am against illegal immigration 100%. You articulated very well the many dangers and the inhumanities this problem brings about. I specially liked this statement: "More than any other country, we extend a hand of compassion to the tired, poor, and needy. But we do it under a system of law, order, equality, and protection of human rights."

Would you please tell me your views about legal immigrants--people who waited for years, and did things the right way, in order to gain permission to enter this country and have a better life. I am talking about immigrants, such as myself, who have taken this nation as my own, adopted it's culture, language and values, and who have no loyalties to any other nation. Is there a place for people like me in your vision of United States of America? Can political exiles still find refuge here?

I guess I am seeking reassurance that while illegal immigration is being stopped, racism is not being propagated. Mr. Gilchrist, I want leadership like yours, firm and committed to truth and to the law in regards to immigration, yet compassionate and welcoming to immigrants who would come through due-process. I want to know that racism, and hatred towards other ethnic groups will not be tolerated--please understand I am not speaking of PC ideals, but the good old fashioned meaning of the word. I also want to know that illegal immigrants, when detained, will be duly processed and held in humane conditions while awaiting deportation.

Finally, I would like to know what sort of options would desperate, law-abiding, hard-working individuals from Central or South America have once our borders are properly secured. Not that this is an excuse--it should not be--but when quotas and lengthy (years long) processes prevent a wife and child from being reunited with her husband, I can understand a person's choice of entering this country illegally. I don't say this is the norm--it is not. Nor, do I say this to express any sentiment against securing our borders. I say it, because we are a nation of compassion and of family values. What will we do as a nation to welcome those who desire a better life? Will we welcome them?

What assurances can you give me that you are this sort of leader?

I welcome your response. Please know that as a blogger, I would like to publish your response on my web site: http://latinoissues.blogspot.com.

Should you wish to remain of the record, I will honor such request. Thank you for your time, and that of your staff, in responding to this email. I wish you the best in all your work.


Best Regards,

Josue Sierra
http://latinoissues.blogspot.com
Here was Tom Hoefling response:
Mr. Sierra,

A very large number of Jim Gilchrist's supporters are people like yourself: legal immigrants, or the children of legal immigrants.

People like Geoffrey Huang, Vince Estrada, Lupe Moreno, Frank Jorge (Cuban), Luca Zanna, Angie Ibbotson, Steve Holder, Rosanna Pulido, and many more.

Our fight to secure our borders has absolutely NOTHING to do with race. It has to do with our nation's security and the rule of law.

Jim Gilchrist doesn't allow anyone to stay in the Minuteman Project who shows the least bit of racism. And he certainly believes in the humane treatment of all.

I very much enjoyed your letter. My experience is that legal immigrants are usually the most passionate American patriots of all. Those of us who were born in this country tend to be complacent and take our freedom and security for granted.

The highest regards,

Tom Hoefling
tom@jimgilchrist.com
Tags: Politics, Current Affairs, California, Homeland Security, Mexico, Immigration, ,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Al Cardenas Comments on Univision Democrat Forum

Al Cardenas is Chairman of Romney for President's Hispanic Steering Committee. I got the following email from the campaign. Boston, MA – Al Cardenas, the Chairman of Romney for President's National Hispanic Steering Committee, issued the following statement regarding tonight's Democrat presidential forum on Univision: "Tonight's Univision forum demonstrated once again the consequences that a President Clinton, President Obama or President Edwards would have on the Hispanic community.  Whether it's tax increases for families and the two million Hispanic business owners, socialist-style health care, coddling dictators, opposing free trade with our allies or putting family values last, the Democrat presidential candidates made clear how out of sync their policies are with the best interests of the Hispanic community. Mitt Romney has put in the effort to reach out to this vital bloc, and, after watching tonight's debate

Harry Potter Mania -- Discussion

There is a great discussion going on at WorldMagBlog on the whole Harry Potter mania. Nothing to do with Latinos, I suppose, but I thought I would ad my two cents. A reader commented: I think its interesting how much people want to be in a group that is all connected by some common thread. It says a lot about our desire for homogeny, not always along racial, sexual or religious lines, but also simply based on what we do in our spare time. The interesting thing about Harry Potter fans vs. Star Trek fans is that a vast majority of them are kids who have grown up with the books, or the parents of said kids. I wonder if what sort of effects this will have on them as they get older (and whether or not they will remain HP fans). We live in an obsessive culture. Posted by David B. at July 22, 2005 07:54 AM This is an interesting phenomenon. I would think it is indicative of our society, more than anything else. I tend to agree with the idea that it shows a desire or need for communi

Communism: Good Money for the "El Viejo"

I guess Fidel Castro is doing ok . Forbes lists Castro as one of the richest in the world, right up there with the Queen of England. I bet he didn't like the attention. It was hard to figure it out, but it seems they managed to throw some numbers together. In the past, we have relied on a percentage of Cuba's gross domestic product to estimate Fidel Castro's fortune. This year we have used more traditional valuation methods, comparing state-owned assets Castro is assumed to control with comparable publicly traded companies. A reasonable discount was then applied to compensate for the obvious disclosure issues.