Skip to main content

Wal Mart of yester-years is no longer the same of today?

I got some comments on my previous post on Wal Mart I thought where worth bringing up to the main page. Dave may have a point in differentiating between the values and vision of the Wal Mart of Sam Walton, and the Wal Mart of today. It may well be that the Wal Mart of yesteryears is no longer the same of today. But these, I believe, are business arguments. That is legitimate. If Wal Mart goes out of business because it does not know how to keep its customers, then great. Free markets would be at work, and that would be best for the consumer.

Forgive my overly enthusiastic comments on WalMart, the dream. What I meant was to find competitive, low-cost ways of doing what we keep asking the government to do for us. Education, welfare, and a huge list of other activities would be better served through private and community effort at a more local level. This is where perhaps I argue there is something to be learned about Wal Marts ability to make things affordable to the lower income segments.

Quality, security, and other concerns are valied and need consideration. Here are Dave's comments. Make sure to check out his blog at
Having formerly worked for a relatively obscure smokeless tobacco company that did a huge business with Wal-Mart, let me lend you a certain perspective to why people hate them so much.

When Sam Walton was alive, Wal-Mart had a different philosophy and a level of class about it's operatons. Sure, they are cutthroat in their locations and pricing. That's why so many consumers love them and small business loathe them. However, you could take anything back to Wal-Mart. Used, broken, unwanted-didn't matter. Their prices were great too.

They were tough on suppliers like my company, but when one company represents 35% of your total gross sales nationally, you relent and do what they want.

Then Sam passed.

Pricing changed from "always lowest" to "low prices everyday". Returns became complicated and not as easy to accomplish. Vendor relations went from sell anything (as long as it sells) to a system of "pay to be preferred" for shelf space.

Literally your competition can now buy you off the retail space. Or pay to bury you on the bottom shelf. Regardless of your actual performance numbers pre- contract shelf and post-contract shelf space. A seemingly incongrous evil but one that exists none the less.

I actually shook Sam Walton's hand when they opened a new Wal-Mart here in Nashville. The legacy isn't what he would have wanted.

It was inconcievable to our Grandparents that our generation wouldn't ever shop at Woolworths. Wal-Mart will eventually go the way of Woolworth's because they too have lost their heart. It may take 80 years, but I predict someday our grandkids won't know what Wal-Mart is.


Popular posts from this blog

Hispanic Trending: Leave your name at the border

Most people miss the fact that Hispanics do not consist of a single ethnic group. Besides that, the heritage that each one of the many nationalities represented in our immigrant population is diverse in itself. As I read Manuel Muñoz's post on his assimilation experience, I can tell you mine was nothing like his. But I can relate to this paragraph. My niece's name is Katie Belle (Sierra). It's intriguing to watch "American" names begin to dominate among my nieces and nephews and second cousins, as well as with the children of my hometown friends. I am not surprised to meet 5-year-old Brandon or Kaitlyn. Hardly anyone questions the incongruity of matching these names with last names like Trujillo or Zepeda. The English-only way of life partly explains the quiet erasure of cultural difference that assimilation has attempted to accomplish. A name like Kaitlyn Zepeda doesn't completely obscure her ethnicity, but the half-step of her nam…

Communism: Good Money for the "El Viejo"

I guess Fidel Castro is doing ok. Forbes lists Castro as one of the richest in the world, right up there with the Queen of England. I bet he didn't like the attention. It was hard to figure it out, but it seems they managed to throw some numbers together.
In the past, we have relied on a percentage of Cuba's gross domestic product to estimate Fidel Castro's fortune. This year we have used more traditional valuation methods, comparing state-owned assets Castro is assumed to control with comparable publicly traded companies. A reasonable discount was then applied to compensate for the obvious disclosure issues.

RealClearPolitics: The Democrats Dither on Trade

The backtracking on free trade in South America has been among the frustrating news for me coming out of the beltway. Considering how the economic downturns in Latin America affect us through the increase in illegal immigration, I would think more Americans would be fighting for this one as loudly as they fought for the failed Immigration legislation. Democratic presidential candidates like to talk about "turning a page" in America's relations with the rest of the world. But what does that mean, in practical terms, on bread-and-butter issues such as trade? Are today's Democrats a party of open markets and economic development, or of market restrictions and job protection?The answer is that leading Democrats seem to want both -- they favor economic development overseas but not at the cost of U.S. jobs. That sounds like a coherent position until you begin to look carefully at the political choices in Latin America, a part of the world where …