Skip to main content

Ebonics curriculum, perpetuating black victimhood

From WorldMagBlog:

Two schools in San Bernadino, CA, will participate in a pilot program that incorporates "ebonics" into classroom curricula, the San Bernadino Sun reported last week. The program, school officials say, targets black students, the lowest-achieving group in the district.

"Ebonics is a different language, it's not slang as many believe," said Mary Texeira, a Cal State sociology professor who thinks the program is a good idea. "For many of these students Ebonics is their language, and it should be considered a foreign language. These students should be taught like other students who speak a foreign language."

Some black activists disagree. The National Leadership Network of Conservative African-Americans (NLNCA) this week blasted the program in a statement. "This is a disservice to the black community that will severely limit our children's skills in the job market," said Kevin Martin of Project 21, a non-profit black advocacy group and NLNCA affiliate. "This is a prime example of what people call 'the soft bigotry of low expectations.'"

This is all part of the left's strategy to victimize the African American community and make them dependents of big-government programs. THe left probably figures that if the black community is uneducated, they become easier to manipulate and easier to control. I'm not saying this is a conspiracy, but it sure seems that it would work to their advantage.

Brad posted a comment I think hit it right on!

A great strategy to perpetuate victimhood status and therefore foster the idea that blacks need official spokesmen and un-elected "community advocates". The last thing the civil rights leadership truly wants is to dismantle barriers that "hold blacks down". If all the barriers disappeared and blacks were fully integrated into mainstream productive America why would anyone need NAACP, Urban League etc??

Posted by: Brad at July 25, 2005 12:18 PM
Another way to look at it is that this is all about power. If blacks can be kept marginalized, this would give more power to those who pretend to be the african-american so-called leadership.What if blacks where fully integrated? What if? Good question to ponder.


Popular posts from this blog

Hispanic Trending: Leave your name at the border

Most people miss the fact that Hispanics do not consist of a single ethnic group. Besides that, the heritage that each one of the many nationalities represented in our immigrant population is diverse in itself. As I read Manuel Muñoz's post on his assimilation experience, I can tell you mine was nothing like his. But I can relate to this paragraph. My niece's name is Katie Belle (Sierra). It's intriguing to watch "American" names begin to dominate among my nieces and nephews and second cousins, as well as with the children of my hometown friends. I am not surprised to meet 5-year-old Brandon or Kaitlyn. Hardly anyone questions the incongruity of matching these names with last names like Trujillo or Zepeda. The English-only way of life partly explains the quiet erasure of cultural difference that assimilation has attempted to accomplish. A name like Kaitlyn Zepeda doesn't completely obscure her ethnicity, but the half-step of her nam…

Communism: Good Money for the "El Viejo"

I guess Fidel Castro is doing ok. Forbes lists Castro as one of the richest in the world, right up there with the Queen of England. I bet he didn't like the attention. It was hard to figure it out, but it seems they managed to throw some numbers together.
In the past, we have relied on a percentage of Cuba's gross domestic product to estimate Fidel Castro's fortune. This year we have used more traditional valuation methods, comparing state-owned assets Castro is assumed to control with comparable publicly traded companies. A reasonable discount was then applied to compensate for the obvious disclosure issues.

RealClearPolitics: The Democrats Dither on Trade

The backtracking on free trade in South America has been among the frustrating news for me coming out of the beltway. Considering how the economic downturns in Latin America affect us through the increase in illegal immigration, I would think more Americans would be fighting for this one as loudly as they fought for the failed Immigration legislation. Democratic presidential candidates like to talk about "turning a page" in America's relations with the rest of the world. But what does that mean, in practical terms, on bread-and-butter issues such as trade? Are today's Democrats a party of open markets and economic development, or of market restrictions and job protection?The answer is that leading Democrats seem to want both -- they favor economic development overseas but not at the cost of U.S. jobs. That sounds like a coherent position until you begin to look carefully at the political choices in Latin America, a part of the world where …