Skip to main content

Latin America--Terrorism a growing problem

Great story on the site by Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. Here is another sensible Hispanic voice speaking out on border security. Read it here.

As the brutal attacks of 9/11 taught us, terrorist activity anywhere in the world is a threat to all of us, and any such activity that goes unaddressed is an invitation for terrorists to strike. In the case of Latin America, where financing and money laundering are the main activities of Islamic terrorists, the threat has long operated under the radar. But indicators of a growing problem have been evident for at least a decade.

The 1992 bombing of the Israeli Embassy and the 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish Community Center in Argentina signaled the presence of the radicalism and the violence that have haunted the Middle East for decades. They also clearly illustrated that terrorist groups such as Hezbollah are ready, willing and able to carry out attacks in our hemisphere and possess the capabilities to undertake efforts against the United States.

In the aftermath of the AMIA bombings, Hezbollah has continued to maintain networks in the tri-border area of Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina engaged in activities that have primarily focused on recruitment and fundraising. An estimated $6 billion per year in illegal funds are being laundered in Ciudad del Este alone. It is reported that various investigations had shed light on Hezbollah sympathizers and financiers and their additional activities in Iquique, Chile; Maicao, Colombia; on Margarita Island off the coast of Venezuela; and in Colon, Panama.

Though its presence in Latin America is smaller, Hamas shares the regional priority of fundraising. Likewise, the Egyptian Islamic Group maintains a presence in Latin America of experienced members of the group, with several members having been arrested in Brazil, Uruguay and Colombia since 1998.

A number of recent reports have raised concerns of an increasing al Qaeda presence in the Western Hemisphere. Officials in both the United States and El Salvador confirmed earlier this year that Mara Salvatrucha, a violent gang with roots in the Salvadoran civil war and branches in several U.S. states, had met with al Qaeda.

Al Qaeda at the door

Reports from the summer of 2004 indicate that al Qaeda terrorist Adnan El Shukrijumah was apparently moving with ease between Panama, Nicaragua, Honduras and Mexico. More recently, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi has reportedly instructed his followers to travel to Brazil with the eventual goal of entering the United States through Mexico to carry out terrorist attacks. Thus, it would appear that al Qaeda has already established a foothold in our own backyard.

There are further examples of the use of neighboring countries in the region as staging areas or transit points into the U.S. In 2002, two Lebanese men were convicted of financing Hezbollah with $2 million in illegal cigarette sales in the United States -- one of whom gained U.S. entry from Venezuela. Another, a Lebanese individual from Detroit, charged with supporting Hezbollah financially, was described by the U.S. Attorney in the case as a ``fighter, recruiter, and fundraiser.''

Terrorist sanctuaries

We must take immediate steps to address this growing problem in our sphere of influence before the threat escalates any further. Toward this end, I worked arduously with my House colleagues to develop legislative provisions in the 9/11 bill enacted last year regarding U.S. policy actions on current and emerging terrorist sanctuaries, as well as multilateral terrorism interdiction efforts.

As Machiavelli wrote: ''Political disorders can be quickly healed if they are seen well in advance; when, for lack of diagnosis, they are allowed to grow in such a way that everyone can recognize them, remedies are too late.'' The proliferation of Islamist terrorist networks in our own backyard poses an existential threat to the United States and to our neighbors. We cannot afford to wait.

U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Miami, chairs the Subcommittee on the Middle East and Central Asia of the House Committee on International Relations.


Popular posts from this blog

Hispanic Trending: Leave your name at the border

Most people miss the fact that Hispanics do not consist of a single ethnic group. Besides that, the heritage that each one of the many nationalities represented in our immigrant population is diverse in itself. As I read Manuel Muñoz's post on his assimilation experience, I can tell you mine was nothing like his. But I can relate to this paragraph. My niece's name is Katie Belle (Sierra). It's intriguing to watch "American" names begin to dominate among my nieces and nephews and second cousins, as well as with the children of my hometown friends. I am not surprised to meet 5-year-old Brandon or Kaitlyn. Hardly anyone questions the incongruity of matching these names with last names like Trujillo or Zepeda. The English-only way of life partly explains the quiet erasure of cultural difference that assimilation has attempted to accomplish. A name like Kaitlyn Zepeda doesn't completely obscure her ethnicity, but the half-step of her nam…

Communism: Good Money for the "El Viejo"

I guess Fidel Castro is doing ok. Forbes lists Castro as one of the richest in the world, right up there with the Queen of England. I bet he didn't like the attention. It was hard to figure it out, but it seems they managed to throw some numbers together.
In the past, we have relied on a percentage of Cuba's gross domestic product to estimate Fidel Castro's fortune. This year we have used more traditional valuation methods, comparing state-owned assets Castro is assumed to control with comparable publicly traded companies. A reasonable discount was then applied to compensate for the obvious disclosure issues.

RealClearPolitics: The Democrats Dither on Trade

The backtracking on free trade in South America has been among the frustrating news for me coming out of the beltway. Considering how the economic downturns in Latin America affect us through the increase in illegal immigration, I would think more Americans would be fighting for this one as loudly as they fought for the failed Immigration legislation. Democratic presidential candidates like to talk about "turning a page" in America's relations with the rest of the world. But what does that mean, in practical terms, on bread-and-butter issues such as trade? Are today's Democrats a party of open markets and economic development, or of market restrictions and job protection?The answer is that leading Democrats seem to want both -- they favor economic development overseas but not at the cost of U.S. jobs. That sounds like a coherent position until you begin to look carefully at the political choices in Latin America, a part of the world where …